"pageinistas"

Wikiality can't seem to get it's own page on Wikipedia or Wikitionary (My account or my IP are banned from the latter from further editing), and for what reason?

1) There is no verifiable printed source which used the term.
2) The term won't be remembered.

I like the wikipedia editors as much as the next guy, but they need to take a more "if it doesn't hurt anything else, we'll allow it" view of this. The word is describing some sort of consensus reality (the idealist kind) prevalent on wikipedia because of it's anyone-can-edit nature and as I said, adding a Wikipedia page on it isn't going to hurt anything. In fact, there is nothing in the general rules laid out that says it can't be allowed. If the best place they can put it in is the Vandalism of Wikipedia in popular culture section of Wikipedia in popular culture, the term is being misunderstood.

Consensus will probably happen once someone uses it in print to describe the uniqueness of creating/changing/getting formal or informal information from Wikipedia. I'm not flaming, and I don't really care that much. :)