tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6936304.post113841822136301942..comments2012-02-22T03:53:29.178-06:00Devanghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08039407801743458960noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6936304.post-1138580556202185612006-01-29T18:22:00.000-06:002006-01-29T18:22:00.000-06:00I added a link to your blog at mine, to remind me to return here.Renegade Eyehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11774809488785821750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6936304.post-1138576700405175282006-01-29T17:18:00.000-06:002006-01-29T17:18:00.000-06:00A court order should still be required, perhaps only for the 'center' of each social network instead of each call he makes. This is a matter for the constitutional scholar though, it seems like. <BR/><BR/>The post is just to give an idea of what the NSA might be trying to do. There is a program on the history channel called 'history's mysteries - echelon the most secrect spy system' which talks about the FISA and what echelon does in some detail. <BR/><BR/>Even the program makes the point that once the enemy knows about certain techniques being used to track them, they stop using those techniques. But, the FISA was passed to protect civil liberties, and it could've been amended.Devanghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08039407801743458960noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6936304.post-1138503334499226562006-01-28T20:55:00.000-06:002006-01-28T20:55:00.000-06:00Very interesting post.<BR/><BR/>If your post is true, why the fuss? Bush has a tendency, to withold compromise and clarification, until his enemy is out of steam.Renegade Eyehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11774809488785821750noreply@blogger.com